|
|
| |
 |
Between the office, kids, and Friends, who |
| can afford the time to maintain a truly |
| inspirational online presence? What's more, |
| with today's mass media as the only source |
| of cultural nourishment, how can someone |
| with a bland personality create the snappy |
| repartee required for successful networked |
| recognition? |
| |
 |
Let our experts cultivate a customized |
| net.personality for you - at a suprisingly |
| affordable price. |
| |
 |
What Internet trooper wouldn't want to be |
| the proud bearer of a truly familiar .sig |
| or well-trodden Web page? The relative |
| anonymity of the net opens up blazing |
| opportunities for third-party promotion, |
| thereby avoiding all that tedious wading |
| through Usenet or the drudgery of learning |
| HTML. Even with such skills (and the |
| requisite time to actually get behind a |
| keyboard and make a presence where it |
| counts), finding something truly interesting |
| to say is the extra stretch that few |
| culture-starved workaholics can complete. |
| |
| makeover.com builds a solution with a |
| full-time staff of culture experts, |
| sociologists, music critics, movie reviewers, |
| and political commentators working in |
| tandem with top-notch net authors. The |
| experts keep a heartbeat on vital trends and |
| continually contribute material to a living |
| database of quotes, position papers, and |
| one-liners. Professional writers cull this |
| mix of datum to produce customized |
| cutting-edge commentary, ready for HTML, |
| NNTP, Web threads - even SMTP. |
| |
| Customization brings to the table real choice |
| for status-conscious consumers. With a |
| "nominal" administrative fee, the net surfer |
| gains an account on a corporate |
| centralized-user database. The makeover |
| begins with a CGI-based form that |
| empowers the consumer to craft a phenotype |
| suitable to his or her tastes. Check-offs |
| for political, musical, sexual, and religious |
| leanings are gathered and stored in a |
| central user repository. While the initial |
| fee covers a limited-time subscription, it |
| only guarantees minimal exposure. For a |
| surcharge, additional Internet coverage is |
| locked in. A sliding scale gives the |
| cash-rich a chance to make a considerable |
| statement without having to really make a |
| statement. |
| |
|
|
| |
| The hook propelling the enterprise is that |
| future modifications to the personalized |
| data sheet require additional payment. So, |
| as trends materialize and dissolve with the |
| tide of the zeitgeist, the Web servers (and |
| the cybercash systems) will be humming |
| with activity as concerned users race to |
| ensure their publicized opinion is never |
| behind the curve. One-time specials can be |
| offered to give those with a few extra bucks |
| the chance to capitalize on embryonic trends, |
| and therefore stay far ahead of the pack. |
| |
| Web authoring services complete the |
| package. Simple home pages can be fleshed out |
| with customized Java applets and hip logos, |
| consistent with the client's tastes. At the |
| high end, a fully customized electronic |
| 'zine can be spawned, complete with |
| personalized theme, and stories contributed |
| by other makeover.com accounts (to give |
| the 'zine a mature look so desperately |
| needed to gain respect from the underground |
| publishing community.) In all cases, the |
| sites are continually hyped throughout the |
| infosphere by like-minded (and well- |
| positioned) makeover.com subscribers. |
| |
 |
Promotional costs are non-trivial. Word of |
| mouth is unlikely, since few will be willing |
| to boast of their recent purchase of an |
| Internet ghost writing service. Direct email |
| may be the most discreet and cost-effective |
| method but has a notoriously low response |
| rate. Perhaps the best way to get the word |
| out is by literally sitting in plain view - |
| creating bogus accounts on all the major |
| ISPs, and letting the staff go to work |
| forging the hype. As the trade rags pick up |
| on the service with the usual sensational |
| bent, PR will need to quickly calm the |
| waters and produce an appropriate story. |
| |
| Database requirements are significant. As |
| the trend-watchers dump raw material into |
| the content bin, it must be sifted by the |
| staff writers into usable material that |
| closely matches the data sheet of particular |
| users. Leading-edge search engines, like |
| those used to titrate Usenet itself, can ease |
| the burden of filtering matching core |
| content and churning out building blocks of |
| ready-to-use material. A team of specialists |
| to fine-tune and tweak the content engine |
| will have to be brought in. |
| |
| Duplication of material is a serious problem, |
| as no user wants to proudly read a brilliant |
| Usenet post with his or her byline, only to |
| find one of identical content and quality on |
| another newsgroup - with someone else's |
| signature emblazoned across the bottom. |
| What's more, the prospects of Usenet hounds |
| smelling a well-organized spam and |
| backtracing the posts to makeover.com's |
| corporate news server could very well create |
| embarassing ill-will, the likes of which |
| would not be vanquished by even the most |
| prominent spin doctors. The energy to avoid |
| such duplication could be phenomenal, |
| particularly as the net authors unwittingly |
| borrow from their previous postings. AI |
| agents to double-check submissions prior to |
| transmission is a possibility, but backlogs |
| would increase critical time-to-publication |
| metrics and, again, the voodoo required for |
| such a beast would keep a staff of |
| neural-net hacks busy 'round the clock. |
| |
|
courtesy of
Ad Nauseum
|