|
"a fish, a barrel, and a smoking gun" |
||
|
|
Visitors react with "shock, vomiting, confusion, panic, and euphoria." No, it's not the dung Madonnas and the pickled sows over at the Brooklyn Museum. A Norman Rockwell retrospective is barreling through the Heartland with more righteous horsepower than a Springsteen tour bus, and it's sure to make American skin crawl or goose bump in a way no twitty British art turk could ever hope to. The shock to the system is not of the New, but of the Normal: Like it or not, you recognize every image. It's one thing to dismiss Rockwell's images as "icky" in reproduction. In the flesh, they're hard to ignore. "Even the most brittle cynics melt in the presence of all that wholesomeness," the vernacular-crazed architect of the Rockwell Museum, Robert A. M. Stern, has said. "They drop the Armani shield, and they rediscover that this is part of our culture." Decades of repetition, imitation, and parody of Rockwell's idioms are probably enough to explain the déjà vu uncanniness of experiencing Rockwell Live. While his rehabilitation is long overdue, it's pretty amusing to watch everyone from PBS to The New Yorker's unpronounceable poet-critic Peter Schjeldahl to the wholesomely titillating A&F magalog fall all over themselves to praise illustration's Great Pretender. The word is that it's finally safe to fess up that you like Rockwell. As if it were dangerous before.
Yes, "the time has come to take Norman Rockwell seriously," says The New York Times, which once derided him as the Rembrandt of Punkin' Crick. (Now he's upgraded to "Mr. Thanksgiving."). But taking Rockwell seriously may prove more of a kiss of death than the previous derision. These recent converts sound one of two notes. Either they simply enthuse in the endearingly pathetic tones of the last person on Earth to rediscover '70s music. Or else they admit a grudging respect, but not for the same reasons as the hoi
polloi catholicity of taste while retaining an air of elite selectivity. Longtime fans have always clung to patriotism and universality as the key to Rockwell's appeal, while a few critics continue to assail his heavy hand with the whitewash regarding the "gritty" realities of American Life. Rockwell's name has always been a useful shorthand for all manner of national self-delusion. Slate columnist Jacob Weisberg has implied that Rockwell without air quotes is like Filler without drug references. Still others have made analogies to Soviet or even Nazi political imagery (Norman Riefenstahl?). This interpretation fails to acknowledge that actual propaganda aims to deceive and incite, while Rockwell's undisguised aim was to offer a frankly idealized fantasy to which Americans could aspire.
The titles of the exhibition's four organizing sections Inventing
America and Honoring the
America Spirit custom-made to lend fodder to all of these groups. Whatever the history of one's attitude toward Rockwell, few still underestimate the pervasiveness of his influence on mainstream pop culture. (Consider Toy Story, Steven Spielberg, Hallmark, and just about any sitcom set in a household.) That is not the reason, however, that Rockwell's body of work will continue to grow in importance over time. Rockwell was nothing if not a skilled tradesman, treating his work literally as a 9-to-5 job. Though truly inventive as a stage director of aw-shucks tableaux, he was famously unwilling to paint from his imagination. Every detail required a real-world model. Residents of Stockbridge, the ridiculously idyllic village where Rockwell lived his last 25 years, trot out one hoary tale after another of Rockwell rummaging around town for weeks in search of just the right old boot to put on the end of a fishing line. Every gray-haired resident recalls being Shanghaied Little Leaguers, Girl Scouts, schoolmarms, firemen for painstaking photo shoots.
rigor that bugs Rockwell's new-historical foes. The undeniable quality of the images comes not from their saccharine pull on the heartstrings just the opposite. It is Rockwell's maniacal search for the right detail that sucks viewers in, like it or not. Nothing is left to chance. If there's a stamp on a letter, it is the correct postage, properly canceled. If there's a cigarette butt on a courtroom floor, a chain smoker from that era could identify the brand. "Rockwell didn't illustrate Middle America," Schjeldahl writes, "he invented Middle America." But Rockwell sticks out as an odd counterexample to the frequent argument that photography and TV have made folk histories obsolete. Want to know what barber shops were like in the 1940s? What kind of sandals suburban housewives preferred? Whether baseball umpires wore bow ties? You could spend an eternity in various photo archives or you could just check with Norman. When some 22nd century Ric Burns does a documentary on 1930s to 1950s America, he will go straight to the Rockwell catalogue raisonné. Rockwell loved making up "what's wrong with this picture?" puzzles, and indeed, all of his Saturday Evening Post covers could be viewed through this lens. The frightening accumulation of detail makes for a feeling that there is something very wrong, almost deliberately wrong, with even his most innocent scenes. That's why he's rebounded like rubber from the gluey attacks by highbrow critics and Am. stud. majors just exposed to the Roland Barthes method. He's too easy a target. There's no need to pick apart images so overdetermined that they spontaneously unravel themselves. There are no subtexts to discover in here; they're all right out there on the surface. It makes sense that many former detractors now mention Rockwell in the same breath as Andy Warhol, that other favorite love-to-hate icon of Americana. Warhol painted things he instinctively liked, insisting that his work was deeply superficial. Likewise, Rockwell insisted that everything you need to know about his work is on the canvas, often poking fun at impenetrable modern masters. He made no bones that "I paint life as I would like it to be." "So sue me," a less self-consciously homespun guy might have added. Leave that to Rudy Giuliani and the Brooklyn Museum. courtesy of Ersatz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||