|
"a fish, a barrel, and a smoking gun" |
||
|
|
Rodney King's rhetorical motto of the '90s turns out to have an answer: We really can just get along. This weekend, the Roman Catholic Church and the World Lutheran Federation faiths effectively buried the hatchet on what was the central issue in one of the most bitter religious conflicts of the past 1,000 years. Sunday's joint statement
on justification issue of whether you get into Heaven through faith alone or by purchasing dozens of raffle tickets. Ill-willed legacy-watchers might conclude that Pope John Paul II, having done his part to bring down Godless Communism, is trying to close out his hard-rockin' career by undermining Protestantism, but the text of the new mission statement seems to be, if anything, a concession to the lost sheep. In any event, these points of theology have been so obscured by time that they're almost impossible to tease out, as shown by our handy Luther quiz. See if you can guess which of the following statements is part of the official teachings of Martin Luther: 1. "By being humble, funny, and competitive without being arrogant, He showed us what real people should aspire to." 2. "During the Reformation, the Church feared that Martin Luther would hit like an atomic bomb and drive a wedge that would permanently divide Western Europe's Christianities. But Protestantism is out there; you can't put it back in the bottle." 3. "Everybody's concept of what the Goddess is, is everybody's free will and right." 4. "[The sacrament of ordination] is the source of that detestable tyranny over the laity by the clergy who, relying on the external anointing of their hands, the tonsure, and the vestments, not only exalt themselves above lay Christians but even regard them as dogs, unworthy to be included with them in the Church." Answer Key: 1. Not Luther. Quotation from "Ruckhead" in a Yahoo BBS tribute to Walter Payton 2. Not Luther. Anachronistic, mixed-metaphor quotation from Time senior religion writer David Van Biema 3. Not Luther. Quotation from interview with Tori Amos 4. Luther In the global village, the saddest of the village idiots are usually the ones looking desperately for dates. Take Ric and Brandon, who created what's colloquially known as the "How long until we get laid" page. Though there are vague hints that the contest "actually started a really, really long time ago," they've now established an online log that goes all the way back to April. Some samples:
Aug. 03, 1999: No progress to report. Aug. 04, 1999: No progress to report. Aug. 05, 1999: No progress to report. Aug. 06, 1999: Ric talks to girl on phone. Sex is not discussed. (Yes, it is the same girl from May 28, 1999.) The Zen-like log entries form a strangely compelling commentary on the passage of time:
Aug. 20, 1999: No progress to report. Aug. 21, 1999: No progress to report. Aug. 22, 1999: No progress to report. Aug. 23, 1999: Ric turns 23. So far, more than 300 people have joined in on the latest craze betting on which one of them will actually score first. As the Internet community rallies to their cause, the webmasters have even begun publishing the encouraging email messages they've received from readers ("One of my buddies actually went four years without getting any ...") some offering helpful hints ("Church girls are sluts"). Though their initiative is to be applauded, this seems like a preemptive strike against being mocked. Er, Ric and Brandon: They're not laughing with you; they're laughing at you. It may have been in acknowledgment of this that the log began heating up on 23 October. ("Ric and Brandon go to a bar and actually talk to women.") After that, the log entries stopped appearing altogether. But hopes that they'd found better things to do with their time were dashed when a week's worth of log entires appeared on 1 November. All read, "No progress to report." You can tell that Texas Governor George W. Bush is getting a little nervous about the challenge presented by Arizona Senator John McCain. Over the last week, stories about McCain's infamous temper appeared in Arizona papers, as launched into the media trajectory by Arizona Governor Jane Hull, a Bush supporter. (McCain suggested that the Bush campaign must have sent her a memo urging her to pile on the former POW, but the Bush people are far too crafty to put anything like that in writing.) The negatory salvo McCain calling this idiotic senator an idiot, that journalistic hack a hack doesn't seem to have caused much damage to the maverick campaign-finance- reform advocate's presidential bid. McCain, after all, is a man who owns up early and often to his misdeeds, whether they be the carousing that felled his first marriage, his lame joke about Janet Reno's being Chelsea Clinton's father, or the appearance of misconduct during the Keating Five scandal. (A group to which, it should be noted, neither McCain nor Senator John Glenn, D-Ohio, truly belonged, though McCain was lumped in with the far-more-skeezy Keating Three by Democrats who didn't want their party to be the only one taking a hit.) It is precisely McCain's unwillingness to feign whether righteousness or good moods that has the leftest of leftist reporters drooling all over him. Nor does the argument that McCain has a temper seem to matter much in the shadows of Ike, LBJ, or Clinton's fabled "purple" moods. (Or the fact that Bush hisself is supposed to go off like a firecracker when his whores or blow are even a minute late.) In fact, the far more interesting bit of machismo-related political trivia of the last few days came when it was revealed that liberal, hummer-advocating author Naomi Wolf was trying to teach Vice President Al Gore how to be more of an alpha male. Considering the fact that McCain bests Gore in the latest hypothetical match-ups, the beleaguered veep might do better to ignore the feminist and take a lesson from Naura Hayden, the scholar behind How to Satisfy a Woman Every Time ... And Have Her Beg for More! The truth behind urban legends has a way of disappointing. The "rocket car" story may have originated from bored high
school kids suicide story was a hypothetical
scenario forensic scientists. So we were especially wary when we received the tale of the dogs in elk two plucky pets tormenting their owner by refusing to vacate their hiding place in a discarded elk carcass. The story's complications a pending elegant dinner party seemed just a little too improbable. ("I'm afraid you're not going to create enough of a diversion to get the dogs out of the carrion," one well-wisher advises, "unless they like greeting company as much as they like rolling around in dead stuff. Which seems unlikely.") Suspiciously, Deja.com showed no trace of the discussion said to have occurred in rec.pets but this legend took hold of the popular imagination anyway. A programmer at MIT's New Media lab carved the story into pumpkins, and soon Chicago webmaster Greg Galcik proudly announced that he'd run that page through the "Big Dog-ifier," a private joke that evolved while
recaptioning Marmaduke
cartoons itself evolved after bored netizens looked for something to replace Galcik's recaptioned Family Circus
cartoons couldn't last forever, and Suck ultimately tracked down the dogs' owner, who swears the story is true. And when she identified the origins of the thread, it all became clear. No one had wanted to admit they'd been reading Salon's Table
Talk. courtesy of theSucksters |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||