|
"a fish, a barrel, and a smoking gun" |
||
|
|
In San Francisco in the '70s, when the free love of Haight-Ashbury had evolved into the fee love of a hundred North Beach strip joints and massage parlors, there was a huge sign on Broadway Street advertising "NAKED LADY MIDGET WRESTLING!" In one of life's great disappointments, that palace of Lilliputian crotch-grappling disappeared before I was old enough to witness bare-assed homunculi hurling metal folding chairs at one another, but hope flings eternal. With all of the Nutrasweetened sciences that are now showing new life in the wake of professional wrestling's apparently permanent hammerlock on pop culture, tiny distaff brawlers may once again return to the squared circle. Or maybe not. Like porn and heavy metal, the two other great arts of the white working-class, professional wrestling is an extremely static enterprise, indisposed to all but the most subtle tweaks to its basic formula. Vince McMahon, of course, is the genre's most accomplished mixologist: in true Barnumesque fashion, he's made wrestling more popular than ever before by giving fans less of it. According to researchers at Indiana University, only 36 minutes of a typical two-hour World Wrestling Federation opéra bouffe are dulled by actual wrestling the rest of the pageant is devoted to freestyle oratory, interpretive prance, and various other well-scripted forms of burly hurly-burly. But despite the remarkable success of McMahon's approach, his lessers have interpreted the WWF's lack of action as an opportunity for counterprogramming. They promise lean, mean, more extreme forms of combat, with less bluster and poses and more busted noses. Indeed, the biggest draw of events like the Toughman Competition and Extreme Catfighting is the untutored vulnerability of their combatants. In the case of the former, where well-lagered bar bullies and smack-talking Tae Boasters sweat mightily on one another for three one-minute rounds, professional boxing experience disqualifies one from the proceedings. And in the case of the latter, the technique and artifice that characterize professional wrestling give way to more primal factors. "Extreme Catfighting is about beautiful women with little or no fighting ability, willing to compete in the no holds barred World of Extreme Fighting," explains the spontaneously punctuating impresario of Catfighting
Productions fighters have little or no Martial Arts training. Extreme Catfighters, fight on Instinct and adrenaline. You can expect to see blood, hair pulling and a lot of attitude, when two Catfighters meet in the center of the ring."
But are such amateur tributes to our collective blood lust really likely to duplicate professional wrestling's success? Certainly in these times of polymorphous aggression, when once-peaceful rock festivals turn into chaotic cage matches and no brooding loner feels like he's really made it unless he's had his 15 hours of blanket coverage on MSNBC, any business plan combining violence with entertainment seems like a sound one. And it also makes a fun parlor game to predict how the current levels of ring-based violence will play out. Now that Extreme Championship Wrestling is mainstreaming body-slam flambés and cheese-grater facials via The Nashville Network and slightly more underground endeavors like the Ultra Violent Combat Zone are making staple-gun assaults a sports-entertainment staple, what will next season bring? The long-anticipated debut of do-or-die prison-yard battles via CorcoranTV? Extreme Child Wrestling? In Scotland, an 11-year-old ruffian named Terri Paul was banned from sparring at her local boxing club. But here in America, where the cult of youth informs even our appetite for violence, consider how much better the Columbine Massacre played than the Atlanta Day-Trader Meltdown the pugilistic prodigy would no doubt find an arena for her talents at Catfighting Productions. But while a league of bare-knuckled Lolitas tricked out in sassy pink unitards would no doubt attract a sizable following, competitions that simply offer more mayhem than the WWF or the WCW will never wrest the championship belt from those box-office titans. After all, violence is the most common commodity in our culture these days, and if violence were truly all that the WWF and the WCW offered, professional wrestling would be no different than Cops or The McLaughlin Group: a moderately successful entertainment franchise but not a full-blown cultural phenomenon. In the late '90s, wrestling has replaced Madonna and TV talk shows as the lazy academic's Rosetta stone for understanding pop culture, and thus, there are plenty of theories to explain its unanticipated popularity. Wrestling is the quintessential TV sport, many exclaim, and that's undoubtedly true. Cartoonish and colorful but with good, old-fashioned white heroes supplying most of that color it moves at the same no-time-outs speed as the X Games. But it's even better than ESPN's extreme moneymaker, because while sky surfing and dirt-bike jumping lack the direct competition of old-wave channel-clickers like baseball and football, wrestling has no shortage of mano-a-mano showdowns.
In fact, wrestling's mano-a-mano struggles are so heated, many theorists believe the squared circle would be better represented by a pink triangle. In this scenario, the ring would serve as semi-clandestine safety zone between the closet and the bathhouse. It'd be a place where engorged man titties could strain against waxed thighs without fear of heterosexual censure, where unabashed invitations to "Suck it!" and "Kiss my ash!" would be met with passionate clinches instead of a cold shoulder, where the ecstasy
of defeat previously achieved only in the slo-mo, blood-and-spit money shots of Rocky fight scenes, and where sometimes the fiercest GLAADiators would rip the mask off the subtext completely and come out flaming. But as neatly ironic as this explanation of wrestling's appeal is, the empirical data doesn't really support it. Scan the stands at a typical match and you'll see what we mean: How many of those beer-swilling fist-pumpers really look like they're harboring a secret passion for Biedermeier secretaires or Paul Turner mysteries? While female aficionados of the WWF may dream about sweaty, no-holes-barred mat dances between Prince Albert and the Too Cool twinks, the majority of wrestling's male fans, one suspects, look to their heroes to fulfill more broad-based cultural fantasies. That wrestling is a soap opera for men is a truism now, but this platitude rarely gets the complete articulation it deserves. After all, every cop show on TV is a soap opera for men, too, but there's a significant difference between NYPD Blue and the Blue Meanie. In short (or perhaps, more accurately, in purple Spandex briefs), wrestling is drag for straight men, it's Wigstock starring Hardcore Holly instead of the Boybar Beauties. Its main attractions primp and preen and shake their greasy, Botticellian mullets with so much histrionic enthusiasm that they make RuPaul look like a blushing wallflower. And for suburban Joe Sixpacks who never read Details in the early '90s and thus lack the quetero panache of their big-city brethren, it's a revelation. They, too, can shine! They, too, can experiment with fashion and express their creative side and dream about showing the world what bitchy, narcissistic divas they truly are.
And that's why naked lady midget wrestling, extreme catfighting, and any male-oriented exhibition that puts pugilism before plumage, peacockery, and calculated outrageousness can never hope to rival professional wrestling's popularity. In the upcoming movie Fight Club, Brad Pitt and Edward Norton star as alienated bruise buddies who engage in brutal, Saturday night smackdowns, but once again, Hollywood gets it wrong. Because while movie-star regular guys may think that cracked ribs, black eyes, and mussed-up hair is the surest way to overcome premillennial malaise, regular regular guys know that zebra-print thongs and white leather go-go boots represent the true path to salvation. courtesy of St. Huck |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||