|
"a fish, a barrel, and a smoking gun" |
||
|
|
When Comedy Central paired will-smirk-for-money couch accent Adam Carolla with peripheral sass-boy Jimmy Kimmel on The Man Show, we hardly noticed the implications. After stumbling across The Chimp Channel on TBS, we began to sense a trend of sorts. But as stricken as we were by the spectacle of a half-dozen monkeys mugging like slightly hairier Alec Baldwins in SNL-guest mode, we couldn't actually articulate what that trend was. Upon watching Happy Hour, the USA Network's semi-covert exercise in saturation Zappa deployment, it all became strikingly clear. TV's ever-expanding channelscape has grown so vast that cathode-utility men like George
W. Heinlein in previous decades would have been relegated to eternal sidekick status, now receive their own starring vehicles. As one-time sidekicks ascend to alpha status, the signals for television's fragile food chain are, to say the least, troubling. Now, don't misunderstand us: We love these new shows. True, The Chimp Channel would be far more compelling if TBS had stuck to its core competencies and given us chimp wrestling instead of chimp media satire. But even if The Chimp Channel's uninspired parodies of shows like Ally McBeal and The X-Files seem unlikely to make anyone forget, say, Mad TV, that hardly mitigates the happy inevitability that someday soon Chimp Channel second-banana-eater Timmy the intern will take his place alongside other entertainment-industry flotsam on Happy Hour.
Indeed, can't you just picture the semi-talented simian trading quips with the likes of has-been has-been Danny Bonaduce and Playboy Mansion party favor Heather Kozar? If you can't, then you obviously haven't experienced the giddy spectacle that can result when underutilized exhibitionists leap onto tables to shake their C-list asses and Ahmet Zappa uses his Tourette's Lite charm to coax faded wallflowers through tuneless, TelePrompTed sing-alongs. Happy Hour is like public access with production values and the occasional flash of real talent. And while it may be willfully uneven, it features a winning, less malevolent version of the revealing celebrity spontaneity that makes The Howard Stern Show so watchable. The King of All Media is a reference point for The Man Show too: Co-hosts Carolla and Kimmel are essentially Stern for the thinking mook. They turn fart jokes and breast-ogling into ingeniously moronic bits that suggest a deadpan knowingness without completely befuddling the frat demographic: If you want to acknowledge the self-satire that accompanies the act of watching women jumping on trampolines you can, but no such awareness is required to enjoy the exhibition. In other words, The Man Show is alternative comedy in the same way that early-'90s stadium rockers like Pearl Jam were alternative music but that's OK because, frankly, we were getting nostalgic for punch lines. Unfortunately, the somewhat surprising adequacy of Happy Hour and The Man Show spells trouble for sidekicks. While neither show has yet to emerge as cable's version of a breakout hit, their hosts have performed well enough to fail upward if it comes to that. That's great for them, of course, but what happens to the treasured, time-honored role of the knee-slapping couch buddy when all the candidates can get shows of their own? In the wake of sidekick Andy Richter's announcement that he will be departing Late Night with Conan O'Brien next spring, the show's producer suggested to Variety that it might not be possible to find a suitable replacement. Like the giant panda bear and the Dismal Swamp shrew, the sidekick is now an endangered species, another victim of so-called progress.
But say you've never been partial to craven head-bobbing and indiscriminate glad-handing. Should you even bother to lament the sidekick's demise? Well, you should if you care about TV in general. Because in the same way that frog populations mirror the overall health of a particular ecosystem, the sidekick population indicates the overall well-being of the vast wasteland. In the '60s, for example, when The Tonight Show was NBC's most reliable cash cow and the leading TV shows routinely drew Nielsen ratings of 30 and higher, sidekicks were big, strapping, vital specimens. The six-foot, four-inch Ed McMahon was the archetype, a robust, Falstaffian giant who towered over the elfin Johnny Carson but expressed his brute strength only in the form of unswerving loyalty and rapt attention, just like Carson's audience. Alas, in the new world order, audiences are no longer so docile, and hosts no longer so powerful. In an effort to convince restless, fickle viewers that host is synonymous with "most," some would-be Johnnys still use sidekicks as their servile audience proxies. But even these mildly deluded optimists know there's a limit to how much the skeptical masses will buy, and thus they choose the most infirm, easily manageable cretins available. A merry dwarf and a craggy drunk so punchy he makes Ed McMahon look like Charles Atlas support The Man Show's Carolla and Kimmel. Frances Kuyper, an 80-year-old woman whose prior broadcasting experience consisted of issuing frosting tips to cake museum visitors now serves as Howie Mandel's sidekick. Glenn Humplik attends to Tom Green with all the placid self-loathing of a battered wife who will never, ever, really strike back. Underachiever Jon Stewart and overachiever Craig
Kilborn that hiring any sidekick at all midget, old lady, punching bag, cardboard cutout of Tim Conway, whatever would overstate their power.
That is to say, it's not just the sidekick whose existence is tenuous. While hosts appear to be flourishing in the new expanded market, they're really just as vulnerable as their rapidly disappearing toadies. If we, the impossible-to-satisfy audience, are always demanding more shows and a greater role for ourselves in them and don't change our greedy, short-sighted ways, we may soon find ourselves with no hosts left at all. Or at least none worth watching. Over the last few decades, new media savants like Phil Donahue capitalized on our desire to be a part of the action, sacrificing sidekicks in the name of audience participation. And now post-Oprah entities like The View and even Happy Hour and The Man Show are replacing old-wave, top-down hosts with community-inspiring welcoming committees. But is this really what we want? It may seem compelling on a conceptual level, but to see how the idea plays out in full flower, simply watch The X Show, where four everydudes with less collective star power than an MTV Wanna Be a VJ second-runner-up hold court each night. Watch them slouch on couches in their nipple-
enhanced uh-huh their way through the sort of freestyle tag-team interviews that have previously been confined to Internet chat sites. Wonder if they won a Maxim sweepstakes to get this gig. Conclude that they're the first-ever "celebrities" who Happy Hour would probably refuse as guests. Toast the death of mass media. Hail the ascension of interactivity with all the unbridled fervor of a late-'90s Michael Kinsley. Click the remote. courtesy of Huck |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||