|
Hit & Run CLXXXI
In The New York Times' latest
broadside about Web millionaires
["A Stock-Driven Rush to Riches
For Manhattan's Silicon Alley,"
31 May, page A1], one
on-the-record source stood out
loud and tall. "I don't want to
be lumped in with the hucksters
of the world, because we have
the real deal," Jeff Dachis,
co-founder of Razorfish.com,
told the paper of record. "I
feel completely and utterly
entitled to whatever success
comes our way. Not everybody's
good, not everybody has the
winning idea, not every idea
deserves to be funded or to be
public. I'm sorry, but there are
sheep and there are shepherds,
and I fancy myself to be the
latter."
Say what you want of Dachis'
way with reporters, at
least it's a break from the
usual mush-mouthed "Our
fortune's all on paper" or
"We just got lucky" form of
awe-shucksin' that accompanies
most Web war stories. We
caught up with Dachis to see if
he might elaborate on his
online law giving:
Well, first of all, as you
know, quotes get taken out of
context. Reporters use quotes
where they can in their
stories, either in context or
out of context, as [Times
reporter] Amy Harmon might do,
or as you might do in your story:
Still, your statement
about being entitled to
whatever success comes your
way was pretty strongly worded.
Let me put that back
into context. All of our
market cap is on paper. But my
partner and I were lucky
enough to sell off a small
piece of our company for cash.
So that's real revenue that's
in our pockets, and in that
sense we feel entitled to it.
Is that what you mean by the
"real deal"?
There is a difference between a
company that offers a real
service and has real revenues
and a company that is just a
concept and has never made a
dime of revenue.
Those are the hucksters you
mentioned. Who are some
examples?
You tell me who they are.
What are the companies that went
public without any revenues?
I guess there are a lot of them.
Exactly.
Razorfish has lost 40
percent of its market cap
since April 28 [the day after
the company went public]. Is
that a reflection of the
company's actual value?
We don't even think about the
stock price. But you know,
from where we were when we
IPOed, we're up over 100
percent. So you tell me.
You tell me.
What about this shepherd thing?
That's something I say around
the office. There are shepherds
who are passionate about what
they do, and there are people
who prefer to be like sheep
and follow the herd, lemming-like.
Do you feel protective of your flock?
Absolutely. We are always
looking out for our clients.
How can up-and-coming Web
entrepreneurs take up the
crook and become shepherds?
Be passionate about what you do.
The people who do that will
succeed. It's the sheep I
worry about, the lemmings out
there with My Left Asscheek.com.
Is there really a
My Left Asscheek.com?
No, I just made that up.*
* Editor's note:
My Left Asscheek.com
does in fact exist. When we
contacted Dachis about this
matter, he denied any affiliation
with the site and did not attempt
to claim intellectual property rights.
Like New Coke or an Admiral
Piett fanclub , Hillary Rodham
Clinton's Senate campaign is one
of those fake groundswells
cooked up by idle minds. Who,
other than people paid
to generate flapdoodle about
this stuff, can regard another
six years of Clintons in the
news without horror, or pretend
that Rudy Giuliani won't wipe
the floor with the First Lady in
what The New York Times
magazine calls "a street fight
with a nasty opponent"? Still,
the Hil on the Hill campaign has
generated some interesting
online pissing contests, mingled
with the shrine sites.
HillaryNo.com, set up by
"Friends of Rudolph Giuliani,"
offers a battery of familiar
anti-Clinton complaints, but
since the coy mayor has not yet
announced his candidacy, the
pitch for a campaign
contribution is couched as an
opportunity to "send your
message loud and clear - Hillary
No!" Which presents the
possibility that Rudy might
avoid joining the race altogether
and merely position himself as the
default "No" vote in a one-party
election. Meanwhile, William J.
Dixon's Hillary Yes! site,
despite its Sandburgesque title,
is a panicky jeremiad against
the Clinton campaign. Like many
a self-employed "humorist,"
Dixon uses words to mean the
opposite of what they say. The
only sticking point is that much
of his site's text is simply
copied and pasted from
Giuliani's, so there truly are
multiple layers of irony. Like
Hillary No!, Hillary Yes! is also
marred by its proprietor's
shameless self-promotion. In
this case, Dixon's résumé is
centrally located and features
such career highlights as
"Security Officer and Help Desk
Staffer, University of
Wisconsin-Madison General
Library System July,
1992-August, 1997."
The emergence of Marilyn Manson
as a socially conscious
essayist puts us in mind of
other social critics whose
writings we've labored through.
Frankly, though, we're having a
hard time keeping the various
thinkers straight. Please help
out by identifying which of the
following quotations are echt
Marilyn, from the musical
antichrist's Rolling Stone essay
on the Littleton shootings.
(Other citations are from Allan
Bloom's The Closing of the
American Mind, William Bennett's
The Death of Outrage, a
Jon Katz column, Arthur
Schopenhauer's On Pessimism,
and a hand-scrawled letter
by homicidal has-been
Charles Manson).
1. Rather than teaching a child
what is moral and immoral, right
and wrong, we first and foremost
can establish what the laws that
govern us are.
2. Since values are not rational
and not grounded in the natures
of those subject to them, they
must be imposed.
3. [The artists'] unconscious
is full of monsters and dreams.
4. Man's greatest fear is chaos.
5. It is atrocious that two
silly, passionate boys should be
wounded, maimed or even killed,
just because they've had words.
6. [T]he search for the roots of
violence go (sic) beyond the
shallow institutions of the press.
7. It was unthinkable that these
kids did not have a simple
black-and-white reason for
their actions.
8. Times have not become more
violent. They have just become
more televised.
9. The central idea of Christianity
is that suffering the Cross
is the real goal of life.
10. Unfortunately, for
all of their inspiring morality,
nowhere in the Gospels is
intelligence praised as a virtue.
11. This is moral bankruptcy,
and it is damaging our country,
its standards, and our self-respect.
12. Man, like the art for
understanding what you know you
are thinking to say with your
big brains in reverse Strikes are
back to calling more balls your way.
13. It is no wonder that kids
are growing up more cynical.
Answers:
1. Manson (Marilyn)
2. Bloom
3. Bloom
4. Manson (Marilyn)
5. Schopenhauer
6. Katz
7. Manson (Marilyn)
8. Manson (Marilyn)
9. Schopenhauer
10. Manson (Marilyn)
11. Bennett
12. Manson (Charles)
13. Manson (Marilyn)
Back in the 1970s, apocalyptic
thinkers and pre-adolescents
already overstimulated by
shark-attack lore, turned their
attentions to the inescapable
scourge of killer bees.
According to the best
reality-based TV science
available, the Africanized
Hymenoptera were due to arrive,
and wipe out the US population,
by 1979. Movies heightened the
suspense, though in the end, the
insects were usually dispatched
with nukes or napalm, or, in one
clever tele-movie, by freezing
them on the 50-yard line of the
New Orleans Superdome. Though
they have been consistently
tardy, it appears the killers
may finally be colonizing the
United States with a fervor that
would do Monsanto tomatoes
proud. One hive attacked a
neighborhood in San Antonio,
Texas, Sunday, and several hives
were spotted in Florida last
month (the bandito bees have
apparently made a home in Texas
since 1990). More seriously, an
angry swarm attacked a group of
schoolchildren in Mexico
Tuesday. But now that they've
come to stay, the killer bees
appear to be somewhat less
deadly than their homicidally
insane movie namesakes. None of
the Mexican schoolchildren were
seriously injured, while in San
Antonio, the bees barely
managed to kill three dogs.
Learn all about the killer bees
and their overinflated reps at a
special Texas A&M tutorial, which
claims the greatest threat is posed
to beekeepers and cantaloupes.
courtesy of the Sucksters
|