|
"a fish, a barrel, and a smoking gun" |
||
|
High school sex fiends come in so many varieties - the pinching, butt-slapping gym teacher, the self-servicing schnook who teaches AP biology, the love-struck baby factory, the too-friendly vice principal who looks like Uncle Junior from The Sopranos - that you'd think students would applaud the discovery of a new and relatively benign variety. But when a student at Colorado's Douglas County High School "apparently found" a hunting trip photo of an assistant principal posing naked over a dead antelope, the students passed up the time-honored tradition of cafeteria japery and denunciations on the bathroom walls in favor of a media-friendly "Honk Your Horn to Stop the Porn" rally. "It's not right. It's sick,'' said one student. "We don't want those kinds of people teaching us." After recovered memory therapy, senior Andrew Nelson recalled a horrific detention assigned by the au naturel backwoodsman: "The atmosphere was just creepy and stuff. This guy's punishing me, and the guy's got nude pictures of himself hunting!" Sophomore Christi Young's summation spelled out the case's high stakes: "We want the parents to know who's controlling us when we're in the school five days a week, seven hours a day or whatever." It's not the junior antisex league's stridency that bothers us so much as its misguidedness. With high schools graduating kids who can barely fuck at fourth-grade proficiency levels, can we afford to let these New Virgins run the classroom? After years of seeing auteur-brother duos proliferate from the indie kitchen table of Joel and Ethan Coen into the Farrelly/Hughes/Wachowski movie frat house, it was probably inevitable that a sister act would take Hollywood by storm. Still, putting UCLA grads Sue and Alicia Fleagleman in charge of a live-action feature film of Todd Haynes' all-Barbie underground classic Superstar: The Karen Carpenter Story seems like 1999's most inspired idea so far. The Sisters' inspired
Web site suspicion that the girls are equal parts savant and idiot. And they already have the critical element for family-film arts mystique. In conversations, they "finish each others sentences," so over the phone it's impossible to know (or care) which one you're talking to: Todd Haynes' original movie was blocked from distribution by Richard Carpenter, who thought it made him look like a bastard. I think it was something to do with the rights to use the songs. But Richard's totally cool with this project, and he's authorized it or something. So did you have to suck up to him to get his approval? Does Richard Carpenter really have that kind of clout? We have artistic control of the movie, and the lawyer promised there wouldn't be any interference. It's in our contract. At the Independent Spirit Awards, a lot of people dissed Bob and Harvey Weinstein, calling them sellout punks and whatnot. Everybody at Miramax has been great. This project took a lot of courage. What are the challenges of doing a movie based on a short film
that stars Mattel dolls It wasn't so much the dolls as the fact that it was based on real people. Casting was a way bigger headache than we thought. Are you going to have Calista Flockhart play Karen? That would be totally rad! But we're probably going to go with an unknown. Do you think Flockhart is anorexic? Well, she is really skinny, but that's just my ... Yeah, I don't think we should say anything about that. What's up with this weird Web site with the old ladies? Are they the two of you? Were you "nontraditional students"? We put that up just sort of for fun. That's our Gram and her cousin in the picture. We have a great family, and we're always having fun with our projects. I think that's why we're getting so much attention. Well, actually, what got you attention was your student film - a feature film of the TV show Facts of Life. Mrs. Garrett rules. We have a Car 54 collection on video because Charlotte Rae was on that show, and she's got this incredibly expressive face. Did you feature any eating disorders in that film? On the show I recall Natalie was supposed to be the fat girl, but they all seemed to put on weight in the last season. We had one scene where Jo was dealing with bulimia, but that was just a secondary ... Subplot. Yeah. But I don't think we got this project because of an eating disorder scene. It's the ability to tell a story that really matters. As any arms or crack dealer knows, if you can sell the problem and then sell the solution, you've got a bulletproof business plan. Nowhere does this philosophy work more efficiently than in the computer security industry. In its coverage of the Melissa epidemic, ZDNet has taken the giveth-with-both hands principle of circular marketing to its logical conclusion. After ably
describing through Word 97 and mischievously replicates itself through Microsoft Outlook, the news site offers a set of links to the various patches and Symantec magic bullets available to cure the disease. And after that, it offers the disease itself: compare-and-save links to purchase Word 97 and Microsoft Outlook. (And if you're getting any "funny" ideas, please be aware that Suck never opens any attached files.) The concept of the reality check has attained an awful half-life far beyond its employment in Mervyn's commercials or by Dow naysayers. Right now the Standish Group is offering a luxurious security blanket to anybody who has successfully potty-trained Linus Torvalds' freeware brainchild. And the latest to board the clue train is, well, Clue Train, a site designed to provide moral support to the disenfranchised Web masses (and promotion for The Sphere) by offering up a ringing denunciation of corporatese and an updated version of Luther's 95 Theses for people who don't have any serious papal abuses to worry about. Frankly, we're big fans of Clue Train's brand of anti-pabulum pabulum: "Markets consist of human beings, not demographic sectors"; "We are immune to advertising. Just forget it"; and best of all, "We can't go on together with suspicious minds." But it raises some questions: Haven't we heard all this, again and again, less than a year ago? And more important, is this some kind of joke? Or is unintended comedy the new price we have to pay for keepin' it real?
courtesy of the Sucksters |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||