|
"a fish, a barrel, and a smoking gun" |
|
Hit & Run CXLIV
Every high school English student knows the truism that the key to Hemingway is what he doesn't say. This will presumably be the rule of thumb editor/son Patrick Hemingway uses when he puts his red pencil to the manuscript of True at First Light, Papa's unpublished "fictional memoir," which will be in bookstores in time for the author's 100th birthday. Why Hemingway chose not to publish this madeline while he was alive we can't say, but having experienced his equally posthumous Garden of Eden, we're guessing he had good reason. Meanwhile, Raymond Carver, who pared the Hemingway style down to its logical staring-at-the-wallpaper end, is making even more news in his 10th year of dead authordom. Celebrity editor Gordon Lish is claiming that his rewritten versions of the Kmart realist's early stories represent the real Carver style. Apparently, he's telling the truth. But it's worth noting that the early Carver stories - the ones with all the weighty silences and portentous "Things kept falling"-type final sentences - are what now seem most dated and self-parodic, while the last, Lishless stories from Cathedral and Where I'm Calling From, are the ones that tend to get remembered and anthologized. These nuances, though, fooled everybody when Carver was alive and his style was generally considered sui generis (one critic said the writer's prose "carries his mark everywhere"). In other words, a story by the author and a story completely rewritten by the editor are equally good. Which demonstrates exactly how important a good editor is. In honor of this discovery, we're offering a quick course in laconic tough-guy editing: 1) Print out this article. 2) Throw out the final page and end the
3) Eliminate every
4) Put a line through every third
5) Cut 50 percent of
Now you have editing experience. Send résumé and samples to: Esquire, 250 W. 55th Street, New York, NY 10019. No phone calls. Not that authors need to be dead to have their carcasses plundered for new editorial content. For those of us who don't get Euro-length August vacations, it's a little disturbing to see American publications taking a cue from TV's rerun season, and filling up the dog days with reduced, reused, and rehashed articles you never had the patience to read in the first place. What new bylines they're offering turn out to be pretty fragrant leftovers, too. Who would have guessed at this late date that Jon Krakauer could milk his fateful climb for one more Munchausen tale - or at least, for the calculated
coal-stirring record-straightening interview? The Mount Everest tragedy that made Krakauer an extremely wealthy and troubled man continues to be a staple of online intercourse, based on nothing more than the climbing community's inability to withdraw from a good old-fashioned cock fight. But as the warring factions in their clashing Alpine caps continue the stroke and counterstroke, we kind of wish they'd calm down and get back down the mountain before we all freeze to death. "Because it's
still there good excuse in publishing, mountaineering, or masturbation, and the delusion that everyone else likes to watch is undoubtedly a function of the head's proximity to the clouds. Whether you put your own life in jeopardy to get the story, have somebody else write it for you, or wish you had never written it at all, your chances of becoming a celebrity author are equally good. The Stephen Glass saga has yielded yet another post-game wrapup. This time it's a Philadelphia magazine confession depicting the lovable scoundrel in his college days as, of all things, a no-nonsense, J. J. Jameson-type editor. Given that Glass is said to be severely depressed and on a self-imposed suicide watch, he might want to take this latest revision of his career as a good omen, and look for an exemplar in the Odyssean survival skills of known joke-stealer Mike Barnicle. Having cemented his standing as the single most unfireable man in the history of the universe, Barnicle is now more than just fodder for his crosstown rivals at the bird-cage lining Boston Herald - he's a model for all of us. Fooling all the people all the time is what we've been trying to do for a good three years now, but when we see a real pro in action, it gives us the chills. Jerry Seinfeld steals only his own jokes, but his resurrection of an hour's worth of "live" material (though the closeups and reverse shots seem to have been prerecorded on a soundstage at Area 51) offered a glimpse at the next decade's most compelling drama: What will the seemingly self-satisfied multimillionaire do now that he's abandoned the role of his former self? The fact that he seemed so doggedly willing to show off old tricks to new fans suggests the sort of deep-seated insecurity that a life of expensive hubcap appraisal won't assuage - but a life of stand-up, or at least the sort of stand-up that has always been Seinfeld's trademark, seems equally hard to fathom. Because it wasn't just that Seinfeld's HBO material was old; it was also hopelessly out of scale with his current place in the world. The light touch and glib polish that made him the perfect surrogate for our own chronic pettiness back when he was just another beer pitchman are part of a persona Seinfeld outgrew about 37 mint-condition Porsches and 568 I'm-so-excited-to-meet-you! blow jobs ago. Now when he goes on and on about lone shower hairs, tiny airplane bathrooms, and supermarket zaniness, he just sounds like a whiny, ungrateful, impossible-to-please kvetch. Which may be why most of Sunday night's material sounded like dry-run advertising copy. Only in the Eden of a TV commercial would we be willing to buy a disquisition on milk carton expiration dates from a man who now gets his milk freshly squeezed from pulchritudinous Jewish virgins. Sure, a career of shilling for Formula 409 and Virgin Atlantic would be just another kind of rerun, but at least it's a safe alternative to the standard next move for a comedian at this point in his career - a command performance for the big critic in the sky. In Jerry's case, that might take the form of a high-speed crack-up while trying to remove stray bimbo lint from immaculate Carrera passenger seat. Or would it be an untimely shower-stall skull fracture due to tragic combination of bad milk wooziness and a really adhesive stranger hair? You read it here first. After all these fights for authorial integrity, it's probably telling that the creative forces behind the week's biggest event have chosen to remain anonymous. Proving that success has a thousand parents, several folks - including the heretofore unknown Liberation Army of the Islamic Sanctuaries and Egypt's succinctly named Jihad - claimed
responsibility aftermath of the US embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania. But the claims of these terroristic plagiarists haven't been given much credence, and as it became apparent that the overwhelming number of victims were Africans rather than Americans, credit-grabbers stopped coming out of the woodwork. Meanwhile, several usual suspects distanced themselves from the achievement. In the court of international (read "especially Canadian") opinion, innocent non-American victims are somehow more innocent than innocent American victims, and there are some bombings no homicidal maniac wants to get a medal for. The even-dumber-than-usual event autopsies run from "why do they hate us" lamentations to recitations of the greatest
hits mastermind Osama Bin-Ladin to predictably abstruse conspiratorial dipsy doodles, but as for the bombers' self-imposed low profile, we've already sleuthed that one out. Authorial credit is something you only claim for work you're proud of, and as a demonstration of how proud we are to be entertaining you, our readers, we offer the following byline: courtesy of the Sucksters |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||