|
"a fish, a barrel, and a smoking gun" |
|
Naked Eye
Much like the better-publicized War on Drugs, the War on Sex is not yet won. Up on the front lines, Wisconsin tax officials are struggling to figure out how to enforce a new tax on sexual products and services. Legislators there have leveled a 5 percent charge on the types of adult entertainment that purportedly cause wife-beating and child abuse, with the money raised by the new tax going to a special fund for the victims of the sexy stuff. Looks like Ted Bundy's estate just won the lottery. Among the targeted products are vibrators and what the Associated Press describes as "dirty playing cards." That's right: Vibrators cause domestic violence; shopping is not a victimless crime. Among the other possible items - and venues - to be specially taxed as violence-inducing are cakes shaped like breasts and penises, nightclubs that book comedians who use obscenities, and what the AP calls "steamy novels." The author of the smut-tax legislation, Representative Dean Kaufert, acknowledges that state investigators trying to decide what to tax under the new law "almost went to Marshall Field's lingerie department." (It was a gun in his pocket!) Not that there's any great lack of anti-sex agitation in other places. In Denver, city officials are debating enhanced zoning restrictions that would prevent new strip clubs and adult movie theaters from opening. The clever getting-around-the- First-Amendment approach: Rather than ban the new businesses outright, the city hopes to simply prevent them from opening near certain kinds of other land uses - schools, say, and homes, and day-care centers, and arts facilities, and amusement parks, and all other areas where children are known to play, and whole chunks of city-declared "family shopping areas," and ... Well, everywhere, but keep it under your hat. "That," huffs City Councilperson Susan Barnes-Gelt, "gives us one more reason to build new day-care centers in the city." Yes, that's a perfect reason to open a day-care center: to stop adults from seeing naked bodies. Interestingly enough, no new adult-entertainment facilities are actually trying to open in Denver. Although the two doing business almost within spitting distance of the state capitol still appear to be doing pretty well for themselves. Tied up in all this distaste and bad rhetoric is the terrified yet grateful notion that sexual depiction is a kind of voodoo, a power that just takes you over against your will; allow your eye to fall upon the idol, and it seizes your soul. Lust is something that just happens to you, and so are your reactions to it.
And where does that notion come from? All those news clips of The Candidate emerging from church on Sunday morning indicate the common point of reference. There's only one name for the thing that seizes your soul against your will, a power referred to over and over in online discussions of so-called "pornography addiction." Here, in case you lack this particular cultural background, is how the Devil gets into your pants:
Er - how about passing the time with a little game of solitaire? Not every decent person dragged into a love of filth approaches the question of his compulsive masturbation as a matter of epistemology; some seek understanding through hermeneutics. "It was hard to believe that I was possessed by demons," reads one post to a porn-addiction site, "but the Bible does confirm their existence." Of course, the demons are sneaky little devils, land sharks that get you to open the door by claiming to have a candy-gram: I didn't mean to enter the dirty-movie theater, but, I, uh, had a flat tire, and I was looking for a jack. "One of the biggest problems I have," reads still another post to the same site, and emphasis added, "is the ready accessibility of porn via the Internet. It appears when you least expect it, and just when you think you can deal with it - you can't."
A challenge to Suck readers: Go try to stumble across alt.sex.pictures accidentally. Whoops! How'd that happen? We can't help but recall the letter published by sex columnist Dan Savage, a couple of months back, from a reader who said that he was het, but had been trapped into receiving a blow job by a masseur who stuck his thumb up the ass of the helpless straight customer - disabling his ability to physically resist. Among the real-life battle tales, absolutely our favorite story from a man fighting to stay pure is this one:
Hotel room previews are an
OK, now: How nuts is that? Is it us?
And so, stuck with the terrible possibility of being tricked - tricked, I say! - into participating in shameful sexual mercantilism, decent folk everywhere (at least the ones who can't afford the padlock and the length of PVC) work with their god-fearing political representatives to prevent the Medusa from drifting across their line of sight, rendering them helpless, rock-hard stiffs. We remember with particular glee a scene from our newspaper days, when an entire congregation turned up at a city council meeting to protest the opening of, get this, a "bikini bar"; one congregant after another asserted the connection between exotic dancing and the horrors of rape and pedophilia. Sitting in the back of the room, scribbling notes and resisting the urge to snicker, we were pretty sure they were protesting a bit too much. Favorite quote: "It all just makes me sick, actually." No doubt. Note that the cure, both in law and in church, sounds suspiciously like the disease, or at least a particular genre of the evil media in question: "Take our Lord's yoke upon you and He will give you rest...." (Submit to the power - it feels good, once you get used to it.) It's hard to turn on the television or pick up the newspaper these days without hearing laments about the growth of dirty-minded culture: South Park, Jerry Springer, and naughty Web sites are all, the argument goes, warping our minds and weakening our society. In this kind of near-hysterical environment, not every sex warrior is elected or baptised to the battle; some are hired to it. Defending one of his shows, Dawson's Creek, against allegations of cultural line-crossing, WB Network President Jamie Kellner insisted last week that an episode depicting a sexual relationship between a high school teacher and one of her students had concluded in a socially responsible way. "Kellner said the episode ultimately sent a positive message," read a report in Monday's New York Times, "because the teacher lost her job, and Pacey was ostracized at school." Not quite as positive as a flogging in the public square, but it's a start. The shame, after all, is the hottest part. courtesy of Ambrose Beers |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||