|
"a fish, a barrel, and a smoking gun" |
|
|
Where there's a memorial, there's
A recent New York Times report
"You are what you eat" may be fine and good for kiddies in knee-pants, but once most red-blooded kids turn 16, they quickly learn to repeat the true American gospel: You are what you drive. High-minded cultural critics and hopeless urban do-gooders may not like it, but it's true. We love cars, and we tend to mark important events in our lives in relation to them, whether it's losing our virginity or getting a job. And just like sex and taxable income, anything is better than nothing when you've just crossed the threshold of legality. But, as we age and our wages inevitably balloon in inverse proportion to how hard we work, we begin to look around and see what other folks are driving. We catch ourselves actually watching those ridiculous car commercials, lulled into a vegetative state by the farm-league studio rock and sleek sport-utility vehicles snaking down a leafy single-lane. There may be one less sport-utility on the market when you emerge from your stupor this week. Suffering the worst condemnation a commercial enterprise can undergo, Isuzu recently announced that sales of their flagship SUV, the Trooper, have plummeted 83 percent since last month's Consumer Reports article. Seems research shows that recent models have an unpleasant tendency to roll over. The last dog to do this trick and gain the attention of Reports - the Suzuki Samurai - subsequently did a pretty convincing job of playing dead, too.
In fairness it should be pointed out, as Isuzu has been trying to do, that very few people would drive a Trooper the way you'd need to drive one to make it fall down and go boom. After all, everyone knows that less than 10 percent of all SUV owners ever take their vehicles off the stretch of pavement that connects their executive stalls to their heated garages. Strange fact, given that an SUV is typically defined by its four-wheel-drive and exaggerated ground clearance - presumably to accommodate whatever form of sporty, utilitarian off-roading you're susceptible to. The fact of the matter - and, no doubt, cause for some real pride in American ingenuity - is that cars are built to break the law. Why, for example, any vehicle needs to drive at speeds in excess of 70 or 80 miles per hour seems a no-brainer, given near-universal speed limits of 55 or 65. Yet most American automobiles have speedometers that don't stop short of 100. And an automobile that can literally go anywhere - say, skipping across the Canyonlands of Utah.... Well, all we can do is urge you to go ahead and buy that gun rack. And why not throw in a couple of those sodium-filament poaching lights? Still, few people take advantage of SUVs' best features. So why are SUVs the hottest model going? Well, that's a little like asking why labor unions are doing so poorly, given the fashionableness of steel-toed shoes and flannel shirts. Automobiles have always been about freedom - or the appearance of it. Never mind the hooey about this country being too large to support mass transit on a national scale. If the sordid histories of Amtrak and Greyhound have taught us anything, it's that we're simply too selfish and impatient - and, perhaps, too self-important - for trains and buses. Americans wanna be able to go wherever they desire, whenever they desire, preferably without having to sit next to a drooling stranger spouting Continental philosophy with a chicken on her lap. While that may be possible in anything that'll burn gas and hold air, there comes a time when an overly comfortable society can pick and choose its battles - as trivial and excessive as they might be. After all, what would this country be without trivia and excess?
In a time where one geography increasingly looks like the next, where workspace is interchangeable with homespace and playspace, we want to have the freedom to literally go anywhere we want, including the western, roadless, and more or less extinct frontier. Isn't it strange that SUVs represent the triumph of such abstractions? That we are able to look like we travel to a place that doesn't really exist anymore? But don't worry: We won't actually try to go there. We'll be too busy logging miles between home and the office, putting in overtime to pay for the damn thing. courtesy of E.L. SKinner |
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
![]() E.L. SKinner |
![]() |