|
"a fish, a barrel, and a smoking gun" |
|
|
Bound and Gagged
For (certain) drudges in (certain) paperless offices, there are few things more seductive than a newsstand filled to capacity with glistening slicks. What with all the Spring Fashion issues sitting fat and fetish-like upon the newsstands, these days it's an especially pornographic
delight among the periodicals and page listlessly through the new ad
campaigns sweet miasma of true push
technology What do we get in return for the slavish attention we pay to the modes du jour? No small part of our pleasure comes from the inescapable juggernaut of scented magazine bind-ins: After spending long hours in a cubicle breathing oppressively filtered
air room. But since consumption itself is such a powerful aphrodisiac, aren't all those scent strips just a case of throwing perfume on the violet? Far from it. Where once wily bachelors in Cologne thought a dab of rosemary, neroli, bergamot, and lemon behind the ears might get them a little nookie, fragrances are now numinous nostrums for lackluster sales - and sometimes even for lackluster productivity. Forget Muzak's ham-handed "stimulus progression" behaviorism; instead, try Aroma-Chology(tm) on your serfs! In Japan, lemon and mint essence have freshened factories' canned air for a couple-three years now, and now the power of flowerwater to mollify workers has gone public. The Fragrance Foundation even dispenses grants to academic psychologists like the estimable William N. Dember, whose peer-reviewed work has shown that odors like peppermint boost productivity, while odors like lavender reduce stress. No longer are the technologies of redolence limited to that which is voided by sperm whales, or those items lurking in the glands of beavers. Even organic chemistry and most methods of mass production seem hopelessly Second Wave in light of advancements in neural netting and the new "electronic noses." For the nascent fragrance-industrial complex, chemical warfare has implications in and out of the battle zone. While some might consider it a positive boon to the web not to have to sniff users's butts like a pooch - after all, we know as well as anyone how hygiene can suffer in the pursuit of progress - the folks at the Environmental
Molecular Sciences Laboratory are working hard to perfect wired whiffers for battlefield surgery. We're getting nervous that, sooner or later, the Man will be able to detect the dummy-pipe vapors swirling around our monitors and haul us off to central booking. In the short run, however, the fragrance industry is mostly still a loser's game played by half-crazed megalomaniacs who throw ad dollars at firms that can't even guarantee their new eau will be around in three years. According to one article in WWD, new perfumes have a 90 percent mortality rate, up from 50 percent just 20 years ago. Just look at one of Giorgio Armani's attars: Despite the high visual recognition of its US$50 million-plus ad campaign, a deathwatch recently began for four-year-old Gió, thus proving only a precious few perfumes achieve a brand recognition that translates into dollars spent on actual product. "Who's Gió?" indeed. In fact, scent strips may have done their job too well. Because fragrance samples have acclimated us to repeated olfactory violations via magazines and direct mail, some now find it empowering to create their own perfumes. While Dember has proved that aromatic balms add atmosphere, aromatherapy seems like an obvious con. Can it really be possible that every physical, emotional, and spiritual ailment has its corresponding homeopathic remedy in particular combinations of scents? If so, what's good for treating While we're still waiting for Eau d'Ennui, Marie Claire predicts a more escapist trend: We'll want "light, wearable scents [that] evoke personal memories, images, and feelings" - smells, in other words that replace the old housewife's mantra of "Calgon! Take me away!" But who's got enough time to drop everything and take a bath? Just have a sniff of Vanilla Fields, tommy girl, or even an Altoid - then get the hell back to work! A quick rereading of the fashion mags seems to confirm Marie Claire's rather onanistic appraisal: The Me Decade is supposedly long over, yet fragrances this season will be idling in a highly autoerotic manner. It seems perfume, like pornography, is less about attracting others than it is about arousing oneself. courtesy of LeTeXan
|
|
![]() | ||
![]() | ||
|
![]() | |
![]() LeTeXan | ![]() |