|
"a fish, a barrel, and a smoking gun" |
|
|
Dead Can Dance
Wired recently pronounced ad
banners dead to play Dr. Kevorkian to the browser), and Packet recently tried to put the toe tags on a number of irrelevant websites; but bemoaning the evolutionary missteps of technology's forward crawl misses the point. What these wastes of cyberspace lack isn't so much life as it is an After all, we live in a society obsessed with dead things, and nothing makes its mark on the market better than a propped-up
corpse Many a career has been
resuscitated by some shameless
grave-robbing Natalie Cole and Hank Williams
Jr., who both had hits by
singing with their respective
(and long-buried) sires. But for
the fact that his father still
lives (a technicality), Frank
Sinatra Jr. might yet accomplish
the same task. The Beatles
Anthologies promoted the life
out of the fact that they
contained new songs by the most
talented, and arguably the most
dead, member of the group. But
then the Beatles were never a
group to avoid exploiting the
appeal of the dead; in many
people's minds, Paul has been
dead for years.
William Shakespeare and Jane
Austen have recently reached a
wider audience; the deader they
become, it seems, the more
popular they are. And being dead
certainly never hurt James Dean,
Jim Morrison, or a score of
other popular figures that have
proven to be cash crops after
being planted six feet under.
Even the recent demise of Tupac
Shakur appears to have provided
him with another shot at a film
career.
These days, an overused quote of
F. Scott Fitzgerald's only proves
how wrong a hack he was: America
is nothing if not a stage for second
acts latest TV programs, we have
always been suckers for
repackaging and resurrections. The
ranks of the undead who roam our
culture have swelled; advertisers
have become the most prominent
necrophiliacs. The deceased Fred
Astaire dutifully dances for
Dirt Devil, Jack Webb's stiff
shtick shills for Lotus,
John Wayne becomes a laconic
Lazurus mortis makes them easier talent
to manage, but they add further
weight to the argument that we
are no longer a populace of
forward-looking folk. The future
is in the rearview mirror, an
exquisite corpse all dolled up
in new clothes but still
smelling of death.
Perhaps that's the problem with
new media; it shouldn't be
promoted as the latest and
greatest thing, but marketed as
what it truly is: a dumping
ground for everything that
defines our selves. The Internet
is nothing if not a beautiful
boneyard, a Potter's Field of
pop culture, populated with all
the flotsam and jetsam from the
ridiculous to the sublime. Kubler-Ross
might have pegged five stages of
death, but there is certainly a
sixth: promotion. We can see a
time when an antiquated "Last
Updated" tag on a site will no
longer be viewed like some foul,
forgotten carton of milk, but
rather pushed as a priceless
fossil from the early days of
the medium, like finding an
Edison phono disc, or an early
Superman comic. Websites as
relics - it makes a lot of
sense, but could it make real
coin?
Web designers will try to capture
the heartwarming glow of the
"good old days"; retrofitting
will overtake future splash, and
a site's rudimentary and
unwieldy workings will no longer
be seen as inferior workmanship,
but promoted as a recapturing of
the web's original pioneering
spirit new shelf life on decomposing
data that never had a life to
begin with. It may not be
instant karma, but it might be
instant nostalgia - which seems
to be selling these days. Headed
into the new century as a
jerry-rigged society, a quilt -
or shroud - sewn of artifacts
and false memories, the web
provides a model of how such a
culture can be cobbled together.
Of course, net culture was
pronounced dead long ago. What
better praise could it receive?
|
|
![]() | ||
|
|
|
![]() |