"a fish, a barrel, and a smoking gun" |
What's My Line? Coyly multicultural IBM ads remind us that the global village has become the global office, and a burgeoning leisure industry aims to structure our free time even more rigidly than our work life - is it any wonder that so many people feel as if they have no chance to do absolutely nothing anymore? In a culture where indolence is rare, media depictions of the glorious leisure of layabouts (like Seinfeld and Friends) become the preferred method of escapism - time porn. Still, the most compelling real-life idols are anything but idle. Kramer may make us laugh, but if you had your choice, wouldn't you rather be Shaquille O'Neal? While even one job is enough to overwhelm most people these days, he's managed to excel at almost half a dozen. In doing so, he's emerged as a kind of modern mythic figure, a master of the time-scarce, overspecialized world that enslaves the rest of us. In addition to Shaq, a swarm of other hyper-industrious types have been capturing the public's imagination over the last few busy years. Deion Sanders, Newt Gingrich, Greg Kinnear - the list goes on and on. Call them the multi-taskers. Like computers that run several different applications at once, these people are able to simultaneously pursue two or more careers.
Of course, multi-tasking isn't an entirely new phenomenon; Shaq and his ilk have had many predecessors. Probably the most celebrated was Leonardo da Vinci, whose MacGyver-like ingenuity led to his lasting renown as an engineer, architect, and scientist, as well as a painter and sculptor. Indeed, it seems unlikely that some future tycoon will ever vanity-splurge 30 million bucks on the sundry musings of any of today's multi-taskers, though we imagine the bidding for a Shaq Snaq wrapper will start pretty high. And even if most of today's multi-taskers are only mediocre at the majority of careers they pursue, we don't really hold it against them. At least they suggest the possibility that one can still break free from the limits of time and career inertia to embark on some exciting new occupational path. As it is, the diverse accomplishments of many of them are more than enough to make mere mortals sick with envy. How, one wonders, can Beastie
Boy juggle careers as a pop star, a clothing store magnate, a magazine publisher, and a record label executive? How does writer publisher singer vj actor scowler Henry Rollins, with his busy schedule, ever find the time to experience the hopeless, savage, eminently marketable alienation that launched his career in the first place? Multi-taskers do have their tricks, of course. The typical multi-tasking gig is rarely a 40-hour-a-week engagement, and even while "working," the multi-tasker often experiences frequent downtime. In an average basketball game, for example, Shaq has plenty of opportunities during timeouts and foul shots to conjure lyrics for his next album.
More significantly, multi-taskers benefit from the fact that many of the careers they pursue are quite similar. In the same way that it's easier to learn Photoshop once you already know Illustrator, it's also apparently easier to become an actor if you already happen to be a successful singer or rapper. In the realm of multi-tasking, these complementary professions function as occupational suites: lawyers, with their ploddingly obsessive approach to human behavior, tend to make good hack
novelists gift of gab and cartoonish egomania, tend to make good actors. And actors, with their expansive personalities and waiter/bartender backgrounds, move inevitably towards Still, success in one career never guarantees success in another: the fruits of ill-advised labors, usually CDs or books, decompose quickly into camp. More than fodder for the knee-jerk smirking of a thousand mannered hipsters, however, these efforts serve as stark evidence of fame's intoxicating nature. Was there really a moment in John Travolta's fast ascent to stardom, for example, when an album of turtle-necked, cringe-inducing crooning seemed like a savvy career move? In today's climate of frenzied cross-marketing, the desire to serve as all-purpose media fuel is harder than ever to resist. Producers and publishers, knowing that cultural shelf space is easier to obtain for an already-branded entity, will generally accommodate the ambitions of nascent multi-taskers, however shakily founded. In a channel-surfing world, maximum exposure is the key to success. Thus, when I noticed in the want ads the other day that Kinko's was seeking part-time desktop publishers, I saw it as a golden opportunity to enhance the St. Huck brand: in addition to my careers as office drone and freelance faultfinder, I could become a service center serf. Certainly that would add to my up-and-comer, how-does-he-manage- to-pull-it-all-off cachet. But when I passed the idea by a friend, she simply rolled her eyes and dismissed it with a wave of her hand. "It's only cool to multi-task when all the jobs you're doing are so glamorous regular people would kill to have just one," she explained. "Anything else is just moonlighting." courtesy of St. Huck
| |
![]() |