"a fish, a barrel, and a smoking gun" |
Radio Radio Call it shovelware with rabbit ears. It looks just as silly, and the reception is full of static, but radio is going online. Of course, there are hundreds of useless local-station home pages with program listings and pictures of DJs whose faces we'd rather not see. This is simply more old media taking its sweet time to figure things out. Recall that the first network TV sites were static program guides too - nowadays, they're so much more. In contrast to teevee's national orientation and cybertopian programming's supposed cutting of geographic ties, most present-day radio stations remain tuned to the local market. Plenty of radio shows still address local audiences and are produced on the spot with local "talent" - the very bottom rung on the broadcast journalist career ladder being small-market radio news. Excepting Rush, Howard, and the various gravelly-voiced sex counselors who tell us night after guess-we'll-rent-another-video night that it's really OK to whack off, radio programming has relatively little national brand identity. But just because radio has nothing to market nationally doesn't mean they won't get out there and market it anyway. To wit, Audionet, whose Web-ported network of stations takes full advantage of their radio personalities' (it's a clinical term) already-indistinguishable patter by stashing it on Real Audio servers for the whole world to hear. No matter where you are, Audionet brings you the radio content you can't live without, be it right-wing politix with Ronnie's son Michael (he's an Honorary Member of Congress) or just the king of
Dallas Sports Comedy course, a wide variety of classic rock stations is always available - assuming you can correctly configure RA and tolerate its AM-in-the-Lincoln-Tunnel sound quality. Sure, Audionet's a pure and brainless transplant of one medium to another. But talk about service: not only can you keep your inane chatter-of-choice going from your bedroom to your shower to your car to your desk, now you can get not-noticeably-different inane chatter from elsewhere around the US (or even the world!) with just one ergonomical and economical mouse click. Monitor-impaired online shows have more going for them beyond the fact that they're cheaper to produce and eat less bandwidth than what growth-starved cable companies know as "The Grail" and we know as "video." They have basic desktop sociology on their side: those millions of knowledge workers, parked at the PCs through which the online media seep, are, ostensibly, working. Audio lets them do, or continue to give the appearance of doing, whatever it is their job description calls for. Think productivity bomb on the order of Minesweeper, but with the added bonus of Your Commercial Message piped in every few minutes - neo-leisure for your ears. Stick-in-the-mud cynics might say that if your average desk jockey really wanted radio in his cubicle, wouldn't he have already invested $10 in an AM/FM Realistic and plopped it beside his monitor? To which the enterprising media exec would retort: we don't really know he doesn't want it until we've brought it to him and personally guided it down his boredom-greased gullet. With workstation radio, as with PointCast's screensavers, consumers no longer have to choose their media diet one morsel at a time. Much easier to be hooked up intravenously. More efficient. More effective. More. Once we have net-based distribution, the radio biz starts to look more like the cable TV biz: one MTV and a couple of CNNs translates to one nationwide alternative rock station, one oldies franchise, one news/sports/weather organization, and so on. For music especially, this will simply make explicit what was a thinly-veiled radio programming truth: it's already the same in every city. Program-director gurus churn out playlists from LA or Houston or wherever they first turned a loser station into a hit, and the rest of the country just fills the CD carrels. With the demise of local radio - one of the few remaining bastions of identity for the American city, which tends to define itself through the media it receives - the fallacy of geographically-based community, today revolving around sports teams and frontal systems, will be further exposed for the fraud it has come to be. Put another way, with Disney, Denny's, and the Dallas Cowboys, why should we expect to have anything but nationally franchised DJs? Seen in this light, the FCC's attempts to regulate the net, conventionally understood as an effort to expand its jurisdiction, can be read as the Commission simply protecting its turf. With the power to grant licenses, frequencies, and coverage areas, as well as to determine programming limitations (the number of commercials per hour, the type of content permissible during certain times of the day, and so on) - to determine, in other words, who gets to say what to whom - the FCC has a dominion that net.casting threatens directly. The upside? Granted a huge potential audience, narrow-interest audio programming that can't survive on the air could flourish on the wire, whether it's genuine pirate radio, foreign-language talk shows, or already-licensed renegades like New Jersey's WFMU reaching an international listenership. More prevalent, though, will be venture
capital-sucking cheesecasters recreating the stations we hate to begin with for no other reason than with the Internet, they can. It may not be pretty, but a net-based broadcast universe will be more democratic than an FCC-rigged scarce-spectrum one. And once the promised land of unlimited spectrum is reached, the obstacle between you and making your megabuck isn't content - it's marketing, publicity, and sales. But then, it was never really content to begin with. Federal broadcast regulations were devised when spectrum was a scarce commodity. As any cableco attorney will tell you, once bandwidth frees up, the rules don't apply. courtesy of Johnny Cache
| |
![]() |