"a fish, a barrel, and a smoking gun" |
Whirl Around the WorldNet Every local Internet Service Provider in the world just went belly-up. It was bound to happen: anyone who's started an ISP in the past half decade knows that all it
takes Linux box, a couple of modems, and an upstream Internet connection. What was to keep Ma Bell outta the act? Last week, AT&T announced WorldNet, its Internet dial tone service for the masses. Sporting 200 local points of presence and 1-800 number access, WorldNet is scheduled to become available across the U.S. 14 March, with special discounts to AT&T's 90 million customers. Now, many would claim that AT&T doesn't "get it." They didn't get the personal computer market, they didn't get Unix, and the only thing they got when they bought the Interchange network from Ziff-Davis was reamed to the tune of $50 million. But AT&T does seem to get the one basic rule of the net that's so crazy it takes an AT&T VP to do the math: whatever you're trying to sell on the net, the only way to make money is to give the product or service away for free. After all, MCI's already in the Internet connectivity game with its internetMCI service, which offers five "free" hours of service for a monthly $9.95 fee - the same deal as you get with AOL. All AT&T did was put the "free" into free, and offered its five free hours of service a month for, well, free, to its 90 million customers. Additional hours are $2.50, and, in a nod to CompuServe's SpryNet, unlimited access is available for a flat fee of $19.95. Where does AT&T get its cut? As with its no-annual-fee Universal
Card a percentage of every business transaction with its announcement that online purchases using the Universal Card are protected from unauthorized use - nevermind that any credit card company that wants to keep your business wouldn't hold you liable for the $50 maximum allowed for a fraudulent transaction. Then again, the five free hours could be seen as classic bait-and-switch. The flat rate starts to look attractive after the net newbie bumps up her usage to about two hours a week - which isn't a lot of time on a 14.4K or 28.8K modem. Or it could just be a value-added for the customers of AT&T's long distance service, since the pricing is higher for non-customers - Internet connectivity becomes the frequent flyer miles to keep you from switching to another long distance company. Local ISPs are quick to claim that what differentiates existing ISPs from AT&T WorldNet is support: the friendly operator who punches in your calling card number when you're on a rotary phone and drones "Thank you for using AT&T" may not know how to edit your .ini file. The ISPs have a point: AT&T might have difficulty staffing its 24/7 support lines with knowledgeable technicians until it puts enough ISPs out of business to give it a sufficient talent pool to skim. And it might be a little easier to support the Macintosh and Windows 95 if and when AT&T ships WorldNet software that runs on those platforms. Though AT&T will distribute an AT&T-branded version of the decidedly cross-platform Netscape with WorldNet, it's put off support for Windows 95 (which comes out-of-the-box with PPP) and the Mac until several months after the service's launch. Missing from AT&T's software bundle is Internet
Phone provider probably expects most users to have already downloaded the software which will allow them to pay AT&T 20 bucks a month for unlimited long distance. If WorldNet does lure the next bunch of unsuspecting Hotel Californians to the net, they'll find their home pages set to the WorldNet top page, a paint-by-numbers version of an online service. AT&T went all out, partnering with McKinley to provide the 10 cents-a-word Magellan reviews; with Verity, for its unremarkable search
engine author of fourteen tech titles (including our favorite bedtime classic, Assembler Inside &
Out net tours for WorldNet. If enough people buy into WorldNet, there will be much rejoicing in Mudville, as content providers, desperate for ad revenue (since all information wants to be "free" - see above) watch their click rates double or triple as the masses look for any way to flee from the likes of Hahn's
Whatever the numbers over the next six months, though, WorldNet is a win-win scenario for AT&T: if they're able to provide a good service that satisfies customer expectations - dial-up Internet connectivity that's as cheap, easy, and reliable as basic telephone service - the company captures a significant portion of the market and drives out the competition. If, on the other hand, AT&T fucks up - if the service can't adequately service peak times, or if the support lines are always busy - the company ends up alienating a good portion of the newbies it hopes to target. First-time users will undoubtedly conclude that all the net.hype is much ado about nothing, and go back to watching Married With
Children years before giving the net another shot. By causing a significant portion of the market to become disaffected with the online experience, AT&T can, once again, drive out the competition. It's a clever strategy, and might just give AT&T enough time to come up with something better than 28.8 kilobit modems to compete with the likes of TCI's 10 megabit cable-modem-based @Home Network, to debut "in 1996." Have you ever not given a damn about 28.8K net access, either free or flat rate? You will. courtesy of Webster
| |
![]() |