"a fish, a barrel, and a smoking gun" |
Passive Consumerism "Real-time transmission of audio data over the internet? No way!!" RealAudio is a proprietary sound file format which allows for real-time transmission of audio data over the Web. This you already know. Not only do you most likely have the RA Player installed - you're probably listening to some punk-ass "sketch comedy" or wasting an hour of your life listening to an at this very moment. Wow. Progressive Network's RA, like so many net.wonders, may not exactly blow away your neophyte friends ("What am I supposed to be hearing...music?") but for the dedicated net surfer with a set of a headphones, it doesn't sound like shit - it is the shit. Call me an idealist or simply naïve, but from my vantage point, I'm seeing a whole lot of minuses to this equation. Execrable sound quality aside, what RealAudio boils down to is an astronomically expensive bandwidth-throttling audio server priced way out of the range of the average webhead.
The RA player is, of course, free, and the encoding software, which allows you to convert your .au and other audio files to .ra format, is also given away by PN. The trick is in obtaining the essential RA server, which, though offered as a free sixty-day demo, will ultimately run you about $10K per 100 simultaneous streams - $100 for each listener. That's without upgrades, ma'am, and never mind the cost of your saturated T1 link. And what do you get for that $100 a head? PN's been rather tight-lipped about their compression code, but, according to one anonymous ex-Apple guru, nothing that couldn't be duplicated and improved upon by a smart, motivated college geek or two: take, in way of (bad) example, Roman Mitnitski's Whatever magic RealAudio may possess, though, does lie within its compression algorithm - which both the RA encoder and player take advantage of, but which has precious little to do with what the company is charging the big bucks for, the RealAudio server: here, Progressive Networks seems to be following Netscape's lead in overvaluing a server product to give the bean counters some sort of profit model, while attempting to grab market share by giving away the client. PN's not the only company playing this let's-give-away-the-TV-sets- and-we'll-make-a-killing-on-the- TV-station shill game: its competitors, DSP Group and Xing, are following this same course. There's a real difference between real-time audio on the net and the Web scenario that Netscape played out, though: in the case of real-time audio, there're no standards, and no cheap alternatives. It's anyone's guess whether PN, and its competitors, will be forced to drastically reduce their server prices in a market-driven attempt to penetrate the broader base of noncommercial Web sites and to establish some proprietary de facto standard - or, to follow recent trends, to appear viable for an initial public stock offering. For the time being, though, the method to PN's and its ilk's madness is disheartening when thought of in the context of net.economics and rampant commercialism. How long will it take PN or other start-ups to market RealVideo, RealNewsfeed, RealMultimedia, ad nauseam, each at its own respectively outrageous price? When the Web is ruled by well-financed Media Heavyweights broadcasting from hi-tech studios, what will be the qualitative difference between the Web and TV? Sure, larger Web sites like approximate this, but the differences between their sites and yours are largely due to issues of scale, not inflated barriers to entry. Given enough incentive and amphetamines you and your buddies could rule the digital world. Major media outlets having access to expensive broadcast tools is nothing new or radical - nor is your consumption thereof. If there is something revolutionary about the Web, it's the capacity for cranks, crazies and cretins to operate with the same tools as and compete with the big guys. That's what makes this whole mess worthwhile. And that is the real shit. courtesy of the Duke of URL
| |
![]() |